Shown: posts 1 to 2 of 2. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by jonh kimble on September 7, 2005, at 19:23:44
How many tests on this have there been? I know in the 70s some tests on mice and bacteria indicated possible increase in tumors, but repeat tests on mice showed no probs at all, and havent people been taking this stuff since the 50s without obvious high incidences of cancer? All the same, there is some evidence that worriesme a bit. What do you all think? My plan is to take it for a LONG time, so considering...
Thanks, Tom
Posted by djmmm on September 7, 2005, at 20:05:41
In reply to Nardils carcinogenicity anything serious?, posted by jonh kimble on September 7, 2005, at 19:23:44
> How many tests on this have there been? I know in the 70s some tests on mice and bacteria indicated possible increase in tumors, but repeat tests on mice showed no probs at all, and havent people been taking this stuff since the 50s without obvious high incidences of cancer? All the same, there is some evidence that worriesme a bit. What do you all think? My plan is to take it for a LONG time, so considering...
>
> Thanks, Tom
I think this will provide all the information you need.
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Medication | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.